Case Study

Running head : CITY EASEMENT UTILITY LINEThe pillow slip of Mr . Jonesconstructing a subdivision overthe backup city utility program argumentationAbstractThe urban center has every rightly to retrieve its relief utility take out . It can also aim Mr . Jones to demolish the subdivision at his cost . The property possessor can at go around recover his payments from Mr . Jones finished a court of law , if not by vernacular agreement . The neighbor has no consider of damages on the basis of this episode . Since the matter comes below the jurisdiction of the allege courts , rather than Federal courts , Mr . Jones has to defend his eluding , if needed with State courtsCase of Mr . JonesEasement of urban center Utility line is work by Mr . Jones subdivision . The metropolis council has every right to pinch the reflect ion of sub-division or for that matter to demolish the construction for regain the substitute utility line for the public .

level take out the cost of such demolishing work has to be borne by Mr . Jones or the property owner as the City intermediate Utility Department has observed in some cases ( Holly , 2008The City is threatening to sue Mr . Jones for fraud against Municipality Mr . Jones can not be charged with an act of fraud . It is true ignorance of law is no excuse (Babstock , 2009 ) But , what Mr . Jones has done can be turn out as an unwitting act of ignorance of the fact that the City easement utitl ity line is under the constructed areaThe ow! ner of the subdivision...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper